Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance
Bibliographic Data
Leslie, Sarah-Jane; Cimpian, Andrei; Meyer, MeredithPublisher: Frontiers in Psychology
English
Content Description
About this publication
- Publication type: Study
- Topic: Equal opportunities at universities, equal opportunities in non-university and industrial research, equal opportunities in corporate policy and careers in R&D
- Publication source: International
- Year of publication: 2015
- Published in: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6:235. (March 2015)
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235
The field-specific ability beliefs (FAB) hypothesis aims to provide such an account, proposing that women are likely to be underrepresented in fields thought to require raw intellectual talent-a sort of talent that women are stereotyped to possess less of than men.
In two studies, we provide evidence for the FAB hypothesis, demonstrating that the academic fields believed by laypeople to require brilliance are also the fields with lower female representation. We also found that the FABs of participants with college-level exposure to a field were more predictive of its female representation than those of participants without college exposure, presumably because the former beliefs mirror more closely those of the field's practitioners (the direct "gatekeepers").
Moreover, the FABs of participants with college exposure to a field predicted the magnitude of the field's gender gap above and beyond their beliefs about the level of mathematical and verbal skills required. Finally, we found that beliefs about the importance of brilliance to success in a field may predict its female representation in part by fostering the impression that the field demands solitary work and competition with others. These results suggest new solutions for enhancing diversity within STEM and across the academic spectrum.
Slide set created by ÖGUT for FEMtech
Downloads
- Womenare underrepresented in f ields where success is believed to require brilliance (pdf, 780.96 kB)
- Study summary (German) (pdf, 1.36 MB)